Boycott spotify now! That’s what we say. If we all boycott spotify, then perhaps they just might rethink their most egregious and morally bankrupt policies.
Last month we issued takedown notices to our distributors, instructing them to remove ALL of our music from spotify. Our forthcoming releases will not be going to spotify either.
We hinted at these changes in our recent news post to announce the new monthly chart.
The only way to hurt a big corporation is through their bottom line. Their bottom line is their sole concern. It doesn’t matter who dies, the human or environmental impact, what is destroyed, or how appalling the things they do are, as long as money is made for themselves, their directors and their shareholders, nothing else matters. Really nothing.
The human race may become the first species to wipe itself out because the changes that are necessary to prevent its self-destruction are not necessarily cost-effective. The greed of the rich and powerful is the most likely cause that will end us all.
As an independent label that has been around for over forty years, Wud Records generally loathes and shuns large corporations because of their greed-above-everything policies.
There have been heated arguments between various members of the Wud Records team regarding leaving our music up at spotify, or to boycott spotify entirely and take it all down. We have now reached a definitive conclusion.
What is the new issue with spotify then? Why boycott spotify? Below we shall give you our reasons for why we decided to boycott spotify, and why we recommend you do so too.
A Conspiracy Theory…?
Something suspicious keeps happening to us, and from what we’ve seen at Reddit and other such places, we are not alone. It’s odd how this seems to happen whenever we are very close to our payout threshold. This may be some kind of tin pot conspiracy theory, but we can only go by what we have experienced.
There are malicious spambots operating on spotify that add music to playlists. These playlists then artificially boost your streams. This will happen without your knowledge or authorisation. You may notice a song suddenly gains a big spike in streams from a random playlist. The playlist will have vanished and be untracable by the time you see it in your stats at spotify for artists.
What happens next is spotify will contact your distributor to say that you have been using artificial streaming services, whether you have or not. It doesn’t matter if you did so deliberately or if you were the victim of malicious third party actions. It is still you who will be penalised. The great god spotify is never wrong.
Below is an example of a message we received from a distributor when one of our songs was added to a malicious playlist by a third party in this way. Remember, you have no control over this. You cannot prevent third parties adding your music to playlists. Please note that we did NOT use any promotional services at all, legitimate or otherwise. If you have followed us for any length of time at all, you will know that we advocate NEVER using those kinds of services.
The safest way to avoid fines due to the actions of malicious third party operators is to boycott spotify entirely.
It is not possible to prevent your music from being added to malicious playlists at the moment. Anybody can add any music they wish to any playlist they make. You, the owner of the music, have no say in this.
Clearly the solution is to have songs wait in a queue, pending confirmation from the owner before being added. How hard can it be to send the owner of the music a yea or nay confirmation message via spotify for artists and/or email before the song is added?
Could it be that the malicious playlists and the spambots are owned by spotify, so that spotify can avoid paying the musicians who have music on their platform?
If you are the victim of one of these scams, your distributor will not help. They will simply tell you not to use dodgy streaming services. Even if you didn’t.
Clearly our distributors understand there is a problem, but it seems the only sure way to avoid it is to boycott spotify.
In order to avoid a proliferation of fines and shadow bans, the wisest course of action is to simply remove your music from spotify altogether.
We’ve been issued with three fines by now and it seems both ridiculous and grossly unfair that this should keep happening.
Want to buy a drone that will be used to kill kids in a hospital? Send more money to Daniel Ek. He really needs it. We’d much rather boycott spotify instead.
What We Know Is Happening
Fake playlists and bot streams are rampant. Fraudulent curators create playlists, add independent artists’ music (often without their knowledge), and then pump the playlist with bot traffic. The “service” is often sold as paid promotion — but many artists have reported being targeted even without buying anything. When spotify detects suspicious streams, they remove tracks and sometimes entire catalogues.
Distributors pass penalties on to artists. Many distributors (DistroKid, CD Baby, etc.) reserve the right to fine or ban artists if they’re implicated in stream manipulation. The problem is that artists often have no control over being added to fake playlists, yet they still take the fall.
Spotify clawbacks are real. If spotify determines streams were fraudulent, they deduct payouts retroactively. This means artists/distributors can suddenly lose income, even if they never engaged in fraud themselves.
Is spotify Doing This Themselves?
No hard evidence exists that spotify is deliberately adding artists to fake playlists to claw back royalties. The more likely culprits are third-party scammers and “promotion” networks running bot farms to sell fake playlist placements.
However, several artists and commentators have speculated that spotify benefits from this system – they avoid paying out for fake streams (sometimes after initially crediting them), and they shift liability onto artists and distributors.
The lack of tools to let artists block suspicious playlists fuels suspicion that spotify isn’t motivated to fix the problem.
Why Artists Are Suspicious
Spotify’s history with “fake artists” (Perfect Fit Content, ghost tracks in playlists) has damaged trust. The fact that innocent artists are punished, while fraudulent playlists often stay active, makes the system feel rigged. Without transparency into spotify’s fraud-detection algorithms, it’s hard to prove whether they are simply negligent… or quietly profiting from the chaos.
* Proven: Fake playlists and bot streams exist, artists are punished unfairly, and spotify claws back money.
* Not proven: That Spotify themselves are running these bot playlists behind the scenes.
* Highly plausible: Spotify has little incentive to fix the system quickly, because clawbacks reduce their payouts while offloading blame onto artists and distributors.
And so, moving along…
Your spotify Subs Are Funding War
The CEO of spotify, Daniel Ek, recently drew criticism for a €600 million investment in an AI military defence company. Below is linked a brief article you can read.
https://djmag.com/news/spotifys-daniel-ek-leads-eu600-million-investment-ai-military-defence-company
Every time you pay your sub to spotify, a part of that is going to AI companies who are preparing for war. We don’t like war! There is far too much war in the world already. Investing in peace would have been a much smarter move.
There are about 10 million artists with music on spotify. Imagine if, instead of giving that €600 million to an AI company developing military systems, he had sent each one of the artists on his platform €60. What a feelgood factor that would have been! What a difference it would have made to the artists at the lower end of the financial scale! How many more artists would have moved their music onto spotify? Even sending every artist €10, and investing the rest in clean energy to run their servers and developing services to help musicians with difficult problems in their lives would have been fabulous.
But, no. Instead, we will have more war. And your subs are funding it. How do you feel about that? Do you like the idea of more war? How do you feel about the misery being inflicted in Gaza and Ukraine right now?
Robbing the Poor to Give Even More to the Rich
A corporation ripping people off? Surely not!
Please read this excellent article:
https://blog.discmakers.com/2023/11/spotify-royalty-theft/
Clearly, a large majority of artists with their music on that wretched platform have tracks that are receiving under 1000 streams per year. Instead of receiving the royalties they are due, the royalties they earn will instead all be put in a big pile and then given to all of the most successful artists.
Let’s say you have an album with 15 tracks and each track receives 950 plays over a year. At a rate of $0.003/stream, that means you should earn 950 x $0.003 = $2.985 per song, or $44.775 for the whole album.
But instead of paying this to you, the artist, so you could buy some new strings and a fresh drumskin and a couple of beers, it will be split between taylor swift, kanye west, drake, miley cyrus and the other top players, along with everybody else’s royalties if they had under 1000 streams.
Why don’t you watch this video by the most excellemt Quivering Palm:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38_P9LAXy50
That is not all. If YOU happen to be streamed more than 1000 times, you become passively complicit in this theft!
A proportion of those stolen royalties, however tiny after the majors have had their share, will also be redirected and included in your income if your tracks have over 1000 streams.
Our 35 or so tracks only received between 2000 and 12000 streams last year. Spotify will not even notice any difference if we remove them all.
However, if everyone other than the major labels were to withdraw their music, then that would certainly have an impact.
Would it make spotify change their policy? Probably not. But it might.
Boycott spotify!
So, why don’t you join us and boycott spotify as well? Tell your distributors to remove your music from that platform. Delete your accounts. Cancel your subscriptions. Just about everything on spotify is available on other streaming services anyway. You can find tools online that will help move all of your playlists from one platform to another.
Remember to tell spotify why you’re doing it when you send your cancellation email. If enough people do it, spotify might think again. After all, like the major labels and big media corporations, they are only interested in their bottom line.
If there is enough of a backlash from their dreadfully morally bankrupt policies, it might discourage the other streaming services from committing the same error in the future.
After the experiences we have had, and everything we know about spotify, we will absolutely NOT be releasing material to that platform until they remove their CEO and implement a number of policy changes.
Other issues which are cause for concern, in order of priority as far as we are concerned, include the alarming proliferation of AI and fake content, the dissemination of hate speech and false information disguised as fact (in old money, lies), privacy and data security, being forced to listen to unwanted ghastly rubbish, and the fact that their UI is just not very good.
So we say: boycott spotify now!!
Further Recommended Reading – our top eight reasons to boycott spotify
Spotify has faced a number of ethical and policy concerns raised by artists, journalists, and listeners. Some of the most discussed include:
1. Fake Playlists, Bot Streams, and Unfair Penalties
A growing number of independent musicians have reported a disturbing pattern on spotify. Their music is being added to fake playlists, without their authorization or knowledge. These playlists are then boosted with bot-driven traffic to create artificial streams. The consequences for artists can be devastating. Not only can their songs be removed from spotify, but they may also face fines and penalties passed on via their distributors.
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jun/03/ai-bot-farms-and-innocent-indie-victims-how-music-streaming-became-a-hotbed-of-and-fakery?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://routenote.com/blog/what-to-do-if-youve-been-added-to-a-fraudulent-or-bot-playlist-on-spotify/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
2. Ethics of CEO’s AI-Military Investments
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek’s investment and board role in the AI defense company Helsing has sparked backlash, with artists including King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard, Deerhoof, Xiu Xiu and now independent label Wud Records, pulling their music in protest.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/aug/29/indie-bands-are-quitting-spotify-what-could-it-mean-for-the-future-of-music-streaming?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://pitchfork.com/news/king-gizzard-and-the-lizard-wizard-leave-spotify/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/07/30/we-dont-want-our-music-killing-people-artists-revolt-against-spotify-over-ai-warfare-ties?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://time.news/artists-leaving-spotify-ai-monopoly-concerns/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
3. Artist Compensation and Visibility Fairness
Despite paying out billions, only a small percentage of artists can make a sustainable living from spotify. Policy changes (e.g. requiring 1,000 annual streams for royalty eligibility) and programs such as Discovery Mode, which cuts royalties in exchange for exposure, have been seen to disadvantage smaller artists.
https://onthenode.com/music/spotify-under-fire-allegations-of-artist-exploitation-and-unfair-streaming-practices?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/spotify-criticised-for-allegedly-spreading-misinformation-and-access-now-calls-for-strengthened-human-rights-due-diligence-co-did-not-respond/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
Discovery Mode’s structure has also been compared to modern payola, while pro-rata payout models heavily favor superstars.
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/feb/19/spotify-discovery-mode-payola-playlist
https://www.makingascene.org/spotifys-discovery-mode-the-new-payola-hurting-indie-artists/
https://www.recordingacademy.com/advocacy/news/does-spotifys-new-discovery-mode-resemble-anti-creator-payola
4. AI-Generated Impostors and Fake Content
Albums such as Crazy Sheep — purportedly by Anthrax — were discovered to be AI-generated impostor releases on spotify, raising alarms about forgery and poor moderation.
https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/crazy-sheep-anthrax-become-the-latest-victims-of-ai-slop-impostors?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
The “Perfect Fit Content” (PFC) program allegedly populates playlists with tracks by fictitious or “ghost artists,” designed to reduce royalty payouts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversy_over_fake_artists_on_Spotify?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://www.reddit.com/r/musicmarketing/comments/1hhntag/the_ghosts_in_the_machine_spotifys_plot_against/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
Spotify has been filling your recommendations with fake artists and music it barely pays for.
https://www.techradar.com/audio/spotify/spotify-has-been-filling-your-recommendations-with-fake-artists-and-music-it-barely-pays-for?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
5. Content Moderation and Extremist/Inappropriate Material
Instances of pornographic podcasts and alleged white supremacist rhetoric surfaced on family accounts, exposing flaws in filtering and moderation.
https://www.thetimes.com/magazines/culture-magazine/article/spotify-porn-problem-podcasts-episodes-audio-xdtthj658?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
Congressional inquiries have also probed whether spotify faced undue pressure to censor high-profile podcasters, raising questions about political entanglements.
https://nypost.com/2025/07/29/media/house-probes-spotify-over-censorship-after-joe-rogan-steve-bannon-disinformation-controversies/?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
6. Privacy and Surveillance Concerns
Spotify has been criticized for selling user data to marketers and experimenting with emotional profiling systems.
https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1670&context=elr
https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/spotify-wrapped-is-a-privacy-pitfall-but-we-continue-loving-it-regardless
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/digital-rights-groups-raise-concerns-about-spotifys-surveillance-of-user-activity-incl-co-comments/
A 2025 data breach (“Panama Playlists”) further highlighted its vulnerabilities.
https://www.twingate.com/blog/tips/spotify-data-breach
https://www.computing.co.uk/news/2025/security/data-breach-exposes-location-data-popular-apps
https://certpro.com/spotify-data-leak/
7. Sponsored Music Recommendations (Ads Disguised as Content)
Premium subscribers have complained about “sponsored” tracks pushed as recommendations, often promoting mainstream acts regardless of user taste.
https://www.techradar.com/audio/spotify/loyal-spotify-users-are-angry-again-here-are-3-reasons-why-people-are-annoyed-with-sponsored-music-recommendations?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://www.reddit.com/r/truespotify/comments/1fygea1/the_sponsored_recommendations_are_out_of_control/
8. Rushed Feature Rollouts and “Feature Bloat”
Features such as messaging and playlist “Mix” have been criticized as unnecessary distractions, poorly implemented, and inconsistently rolled out.
https://www.tomsguide.com/entertainment/music-streaming/i-have-a-big-problem-with-spotifys-new-messaging-feature-heres-why?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk
https://www.techradar.com/audio/spotify/this-is-one-of-the-most-confusing-updates-theyve-ever-done-spotify-users-are-frustrated-with-the-absence-of-audio-mixing-and-messages-features?utm_source=wudrecords.co.uk